× #1 Article 51-A of the Indian Constitution: Fundamental Duties #2 Article 167 of the Indian Constitution | Role of the Chief Minister #3 Article 352 of the Indian Constitution | Emergency Provisions #4 Article 75 of the Indian Constitution: The Role of the Prime Minister #5 Indian Constitution on Protecting Diversity: A Look at Articles 29 & 30 #6 Articles 25 to 28 of the Indian Constitution #7 Article 23 and 24 of the Indian Constitution #8 Article 21A of the Indian Constitution #9 Indian Constitution in Simple Words #10 Article 22 | Protection Against Arrest and Detention #11 Article 21: Right to Life and Personal Liberty #12 Article 20 of the Indian Constitution #13 Article 19: Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution #14 Article 17 and 18 of the Indian Constitution #15 Articles 17 and 18 of the Indian Constitution #16 Article 16 of the Indian Constitution #17 Article 15 of the Indian Constitution #18 Article 13 of the Indian Constitution #19 Article 12 of the Indian Constitution #20 Article 14 Constitution of India
00:00
08:27

Introduction

Article 20 is a crucial part of the Fundamental Rights under the Indian Constitution, as it ensures protection to individuals who are accused of criminal offenses. It provides safeguards against arbitrary or unjust convictions by guaranteeing the right to fair trial and protection from self-incrimination. It also prevents double jeopardy, meaning a person cannot be tried or punished for the same offense more than once. Article 20 is vital in protecting the fundamental rights of individuals in the criminal justice system and promotes the principle of rule of law in India.


Key Provisions of Article 20

  1. Protection Against Ex Post Facto Laws (Clause 1):

    • Article 20(1) states that no person can be convicted of an offense except according to the law that was in force at the time the offense was committed. This is known as the principle of no punishment without law. It ensures that a person cannot be punished for an act that was not considered a crime at the time it was committed.

      • For example, if an individual commits an act that is legal at the time but later a law is passed making that act illegal, the individual cannot be prosecuted for that act under the new law. This protects people from retrospective legislation.

  2. Protection Against Double Jeopardy (Clause 2):

    • Article 20(2) provides that no person can be tried and punished twice for the same offense. This protection is often referred to as double jeopardy.

      • For instance, if a person has been tried and acquitted for a particular offense, they cannot be tried again for the same offense in the future, even if new evidence comes to light. This provision helps avoid harassment and undue persecution of an individual.

  3. Protection Against Self-Incrimination (Clause 3):

    • Article 20(3) guarantees that no person shall be compelled to be a witness against themselves. This means that an accused person cannot be forced to provide evidence or make statements that would incriminate them.

      • This clause is fundamental in ensuring the right against self-incrimination and reflects the principle of innocent until proven guilty. The right to silence is a key aspect of this protection, where an accused person can refuse to answer questions that might implicate them in a crime.

      • This is similar to the Miranda rights in many western legal systems, where individuals are informed of their right to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination.


The Purpose and Significance of Article 20

  1. Fairness in the Criminal Justice System:

    • Article 20 ensures that the criminal justice system functions in a fair and just manner, protecting individuals from arbitrary or unjust punishment. By preventing ex post facto laws, double jeopardy, and self-incrimination, it upholds the principles of justice, ensuring that people are not unfairly prosecuted or punished.

  2. Prevention of Arbitrary and Retroactive Legislation:

    • One of the core principles of Article 20(1) is the prohibition against ex post facto laws, which means that laws cannot be applied retroactively to punish an individual. This ensures that laws are made prospective, and people cannot be punished for actions that were not criminal at the time they were committed. This is essential for the principle of legality, which is fundamental to any just legal system.

  3. Right to Protection Against Double Jeopardy:

    • Article 20(2) ensures that once an individual has been acquitted or convicted, they cannot be tried again for the same offense. This is crucial to protect individuals from the legal system’s abuse of power and continuous persecution. It helps ensure finality in legal proceedings and prevents the state from subjecting individuals to endless trials.

  4. Right to Silence and Protection from Forced Confessions:

    • The protection against self-incrimination under Article 20(3) is a cornerstone of individual rights. By guaranteeing that individuals cannot be forced to testify against themselves, this provision ensures that confessions cannot be coerced or extracted under duress. It also ensures that the burden of proof lies on the prosecution, not on the accused.


Judicial Interpretation of Article 20

The Supreme Court of India has given various interpretations of Article 20 over the years, expanding its scope to include certain rights that are implied but not explicitly mentioned in the text. Some notable cases include:

  1. Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962):

    • The Supreme Court held that Article 20(1) bars the retrospective application of penal laws, emphasizing that no person can be convicted for an act that was not a crime at the time it was committed.

  2. State of Maharashtra v. Bombay Canteen (1956):

    • The Court elaborated on double jeopardy under Article 20(2), reinforcing the idea that an individual cannot be tried for the same offense more than once, even if new evidence is found after an acquittal.

  3. Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani (1978):

    • In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the right to remain silent under Article 20(3), stating that forcing a person to answer questions that could incriminate them violates their rights under the Constitution.

  4. M. P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra (1954):

    • The Court recognized that self-incrimination protection under Article 20(3) applies not only to criminal cases but also to legal proceedings involving the production of evidence. The protection extends to ensuring that individuals are not forced to disclose self-incriminating evidence in any legal process.


Limitations of Article 20

While Article 20 provides comprehensive protection against unfair convictions, it does have certain limitations:

  1. Preventive Detention Laws:

    • Article 20 does not apply to laws related to preventive detention. In certain cases, an individual may be detained without trial under laws such as the National Security Act (NSA), where the person is not necessarily convicted of any offense but is detained for reasons related to national security or public order.

  2. Exceptions in Cases of Emergency:

    • During a national emergency, certain fundamental rights, including the protection provided by Article 20, may be suspended under Article 359. However, even in such cases, Article 20(1) (protection from ex post facto laws) cannot be suspended.

  3. Non-Application in Civil and Family Law:

    • Article 20 is exclusively applicable to criminal law and does not apply to civil matters or family law cases, where a person can be held liable based on the applicable laws governing those areas.


Conclusion

Article 20 of the Indian Constitution is a vital safeguard for individual rights within the criminal justice system. By protecting individuals from retrospective laws, double jeopardy, and self-incrimination, it ensures that every accused person is treated with fairness and dignity. These provisions limit the power of the state, ensuring that no person is subjected to arbitrary punishment or repeated trials for the same offense.

As India continues to evolve as a democratic nation, Article 20 plays a crucial role in upholding justice and accountability. It reinforces the principle of rule of law and ensures that even in the face of criminal accusations, a person’s fundamental rights are respected, protecting them from undue harassment or wrongful conviction.