Introduction
The death of Aurangzeb in 1707 marked the end of effective centralized Mughal rule in India. What followed was a series of weak and often puppet emperors, incapable of maintaining the vast and fractured empire he left behind. The 18th century was characterized by succession crises, regional revolts, foreign invasions, and the emergence of powerful provincial kingdoms. Simultaneously, the British East India Company exploited the political vacuum to expand its control. This period from 1707 to 1857 is known as the era of the Later Mughals, marked by internal chaos and the gradual erosion of imperial authority.
1. Bahadur Shah I (1707–1712): A Struggle to Stabilize
-
Also known as Shah Alam I, he was Aurangzeb’s eldest son.
-
Tried to reconcile with Rajputs, Marathas, and Sikhs, but lacked the authority to enforce decisions.
-
Rebellions by the Sikhs under Banda Bahadur erupted, weakening imperial control in the Punjab.
-
After his death, a war of succession broke out among his sons, further destabilizing the court.
2. Jahandar Shah & Farrukhsiyar: Rise of the Nobles
a. Jahandar Shah (1712–1713)
-
Ruled only for a year with the backing of Zulfiqar Khan, a powerful noble.
-
Known for decadence and court intrigues.
-
Overthrown by his nephew Farrukhsiyar with the help of the Sayyid Brothers.
b. Farrukhsiyar (1713–1719)
-
Became a puppet in the hands of the Sayyid Brothers, powerful kingmakers.
-
Granted trade privileges to the British East India Company in 1717, a decision that proved historically significant.
-
Eventually, he was blinded and executed by the Sayyids, signaling the start of noble dominance over the Mughal throne.
3. Muhammad Shah 'Rangeela' (1719–1748): A Period of Cultural Decay
-
Nicknamed "Rangeela" for his luxurious and pleasure-seeking lifestyle.
-
Lost Deccan to the Nizam of Hyderabad, Bengal to the Murshid Quli Khan, and Awadh to Saadat Khan.
-
Faced the invasion of Nadir Shah (Persia) in 1739, who plundered Delhi and carried away the Peacock Throne and the Kohinoor diamond.
-
Marked the beginning of Delhi’s transformation into a vulnerable city under siege.
4. Ahmad Shah Bahadur to Shah Alam II: Puppet Rulers and Empire Collapse
a. Ahmad Shah Bahadur (1748–1754)
-
Incompetent and dominated by his mother and noble Imad-ul-Mulk.
-
Defeated by Ahmad Shah Abdali, a former general of Nadir Shah, who raided India multiple times.
b. Alamgir II (1754–1759)
-
Another puppet ruler; court politics dominated by Imad-ul-Mulk and the Marathas.
c. Shah Jahan III & Short-Term Rulers
-
Political chaos with puppet emperors being made and unmade.
-
The Mughal emperor's authority became nominal, with real power lying with regional lords.
5. Shah Alam II (1759–1806): A Wandering Emperor
-
Tried to reassert authority but failed due to British and Maratha dominance.
-
Defeated by the British in the Battle of Buxar (1764).
-
Became a pensioner of the East India Company, residing in Allahabad under their protection.
-
In 1803, he was restored to Delhi by the British after they defeated the Marathas in the Second Anglo-Maratha War.
6. Akbar Shah II & Bahadur Shah Zafar: Symbolic Monarchs
a. Akbar Shah II (1806–1837)
-
Held nominal power, mostly a symbolic head under British protection.
-
His son Mirza Ghalib, the renowned Urdu poet, was a part of his court.
-
Tried to name his son Mirza Jahangir as heir, but the British opposed.
b. Bahadur Shah Zafar (1837–1857)
-
The last Mughal emperor.
-
Became the symbolic leader of the Revolt of 1857, though with no military or administrative role.
-
After the revolt failed, the British exiled him to Rangoon (Burma).
-
With his death in 1862, the Mughal Empire officially ended.
7. Decline Factors
a. Weak Successors
-
No emperor after Aurangzeb had the vision or strength to manage the empire.
-
Succession disputes and noble interference weakened centralized authority.
b. Rise of Regional Powers
-
Emergence of Marathas, Sikhs, Jats, Rajputs, Hyderabad, Awadh, and Bengal as independent or semi-independent kingdoms.
c. Foreign Invasions
-
Continuous plundering by Nadir Shah and Ahmad Shah Abdali weakened Delhi economically and militarily.
d. British Colonial Expansion
-
East India Company cleverly played regional powers against each other.
-
Took over revenue collection after Buxar (1764) and military control after Plassey (1757).
-
Reduced the emperor to a figurehead and finally removed the Mughal name from all official documents post-1857.
8. Cultural Shifts and the End of an Era
-
Decline in Mughal art, music, and architecture due to political instability.
-
Delhi, once the cultural capital, fell into decay and disorder.
-
However, literature, especially Urdu poetry, flourished under patronage even during decline.
Conclusion
The Later Mughals presided over the unraveling of one of the most powerful empires in the world. While the empire's grandeur and legacy lived on in architecture and art, politically it had become hollow. The period from 1707 to 1857 was one of fragmentation, regional assertion, and colonial manipulation. The final blow came with the Revolt of 1857, after which the British Crown formally abolished the Mughal dynasty. The decline of the Mughals wasn't a sudden collapse but a slow fading of imperial light, giving way to a new age of foreign rule in India.