Introduction
After Warren Hastings’ eventful and controversial governance, the British Crown sought a trustworthy and capable administrator to bring stability and reform. They appointed Charles Cornwallis, a distinguished military commander and aristocrat, who had earlier served in the American Revolutionary War. Though defeated in America at Yorktown (1781), his administrative capabilities were valued. In India, Cornwallis undertook key reforms that would define British rule for decades, balancing central authority, legal uniformity, and land revenue policy.
Early Background and Appointment
-
Born in 1738 into an English aristocratic family.
-
Educated at Eton and a military academy in Turin.
-
Fought in the Seven Years' War and American Revolutionary War.
-
After his return from America, he was appointed Governor-General and Commander-in-Chief in India in 1786.
Major Administrative and Judicial Reforms
1. Cornwallis Code (1793)
-
A comprehensive set of regulations and reforms aimed at making governance more systematic.
-
Introduced separation of powers between judiciary and executive.
-
Judges and collectors were to function independently.
-
Europeanization of the civil service: Only Britishers were allowed in higher administrative roles.
2. Judicial Reforms
-
Established civil and criminal courts at the district and provincial levels.
-
Set up Sadar Diwani Adalat (civil court) and Sadar Nizamat Adalat (criminal court) in Calcutta.
-
Appointed British judges, replacing Indian officials in high courts.
-
Laws were codified and made more uniform.
3. Civil Services and Anti-Corruption Measures
-
Implemented strict rules for Company officials.
-
Salaries of officers were increased to reduce corruption.
-
Company servants were prohibited from engaging in private trade or accepting gifts.
Permanent Settlement of Bengal (1793)
Background
-
The East India Company faced revenue uncertainty due to fluctuating agricultural output and inefficient collection systems.
Key Features
-
Zamindars were recognized as hereditary landowners.
-
They were required to pay a fixed land revenue to the Company.
-
If they failed, their lands could be auctioned off.
-
Settlement was permanent, meaning revenue demand would not be increased later.
Objectives
-
Ensure stable income for the Company.
-
Encourage investment in agriculture by giving Zamindars ownership.
Consequences
-
While it ensured fixed revenue, it led to exploitation of peasants.
-
Zamindars became absentee landlords in many cases.
-
Agricultural productivity stagnated in some regions due to lack of incentives for tenants.
Military Campaigns
Third Anglo-Mysore War (1790–1792)
-
Cornwallis personally led British forces against Tipu Sultan.
-
Allied with the Marathas and the Nizam of Hyderabad.
-
Resulted in Treaty of Seringapatam (1792):
-
Tipu ceded half of his territory to the British and allies.
-
Delivered two of his sons as hostages to the British.
-
Legacy and Historical Significance
Positive Contributions
-
Laid the foundation for a professional and centralized bureaucracy.
-
Streamlined judiciary with uniform procedures and codified laws.
-
Introduced discipline and structure in revenue collection.
-
Sought to reduce corruption and make governance more ethical.
Criticism
-
Racial discrimination in civil services—Indians were excluded from higher posts.
-
The Permanent Settlement led to rural distress and Zamindari exploitation.
-
Excessive reliance on British personnel undermined Indian institutions and talent.
Later Life and Death
-
Returned to Britain in 1793 after completing his tenure.
-
Briefly sent back to India in 1805 as Governor-General again, but died within a few months.
-
Buried in Ghaziabad, near Delhi.
Conclusion
Lord Cornwallis' era (1786–1793) was transformative for the British East India Company’s rule in India. He implemented systematic administrative reforms, curbed corruption, and established a judicial system that remained in use for decades. His introduction of the Permanent Settlement had far-reaching consequences—both good and bad.
While Cornwallis was an earnest reformer, his approach reflected the colonial mindset of the time—centralized control, distrust of Indian talent, and a strong emphasis on British legal and bureaucratic frameworks. Nevertheless, he remains one of the most impactful figures in the early phase of British rule, shaping the colonial administrative legacy that would define India’s governance for the next 150 years.