Introduction
The Mughal Empire, which ruled much of the Indian subcontinent from the early 16th to the 18th century, is often remembered for its magnificent architecture, cultural achievements, and powerful rulers. However, beneath this imperial grandeur lay a complex and centralized administrative framework that held the empire together. From Babur’s early attempts to Akbar’s administrative genius, and eventually the decline during the later Mughals, the Mughal system reflected a keen understanding of governance, resource management, and control over a diverse and stratified society.
1. Nature of the Mughal State: Centralization with Flexibility
-
The Mughals followed a highly centralized system, with the emperor at the apex of all decision-making.
-
Despite the central authority, there was flexibility in local governance, allowing accommodation of regional practices and power holders (zamindars and local chieftains).
-
Emphasis was placed on bureaucratic hierarchy, record-keeping, and revenue collection.
2. Central Administration
a. Emperor
-
The emperor was the supreme authority, considered the shadow of God on Earth (Zill-e-Ilahi).
-
He had absolute control over administration, military, justice, and appointments.
b. Important Officials at the Centre
-
Wazir (Prime Minister): Head of revenue and finance, sometimes called Diwan-i-Kul.
-
Mir Bakshi: Head of the military and intelligence; maintained the mansabdars’ records.
-
Sadr-us-Sudur: In charge of religious endowments and judiciary.
-
Qazi-ul-Quzat: Chief justice of the empire.
-
Mir Saman: Supervisor of the royal household and karkhanas (workshops).
3. Mansabdari System
a. Origin and Purpose
-
Introduced by Akbar, the Mansabdari system was a rank-based system to regulate the nobility and military.
-
It unified the civil and military administration under one hierarchy.
b. Key Features
-
Each officer (mansabdar) was assigned a rank (mansab) ranging from 10 to 10,000, usually expressed in Zat and Sawār:
-
Zat: Denoted personal status and salary.
-
Sawār: Number of cavalrymen a mansabdar had to maintain.
-
-
The rank was not hereditary, and promotions or demotions were at the emperor’s discretion.
-
Jagirs (land revenue assignments) were given in lieu of salaries, but were non-hereditary and transferable.
-
A dagh (branding system) and chehra (description) system ensured soldiers and horses were not faked on paper.
c. Advantages
-
Prevented feudal decentralization.
-
Ensured loyalty to the emperor, not to a region.
-
Created a standardized military bureaucracy.
4. Provincial Administration
a. Division of the Empire
-
The empire was divided into Subas (provinces).
-
Under Akbar, there were 15 Subas, later expanding further.
b. Provincial Officials
-
Subedar – Governor of the province; represented the emperor and maintained law and order.
-
Diwan – In charge of provincial revenue.
-
Bakshi – Maintained provincial army records.
-
Sadr – Managed religious and charitable endowments.
-
Qazi – Judicial authority in the province.
-
Each Suba was further divided into Sarkars (districts), Parganas (groups of villages), and villages.
5. Revenue Administration (Zabt System)
a. Todar Mal’s Reforms
-
Akbar’s finance minister Raja Todar Mal introduced the Zabt system, a standardized method of land revenue assessment.
-
Based on measurement of land (bigha) and classification by productivity.
-
Revenue fixed in cash (not in kind), leading to monetization of the economy.
-
Introduced Ain-i-Dahsala (ten-year average) system in parts of northern India.
b. Other Revenue Systems
-
Batai (share of produce), Kankut (estimated yield), and Nasaq (past records) were also used in different regions.
-
Revenue was collected by Amils (revenue officials) and through Zamindars (landholders), who played a crucial intermediary role.
6. Judicial System
-
The Mughals followed Islamic law (Sharia) for Muslims and customary laws for non-Muslims.
-
The emperor was the highest judge.
-
At lower levels, Qazis handled civil and criminal cases.
-
Justice was often swift, and public punishments were common.
7. Military Administration
-
The military was tied to the mansabdari system, where each mansabdar had to maintain a contingent of cavalry.
-
Forts, arsenals, and a standing army existed in addition to the nobles’ private armies.
-
Emperors maintained elephants, artillery, and war-boats.
8. Decline of the Administrative System
-
By the late 17th century, the system began to weaken due to:
-
Corruption and jagir crises.
-
Non-payment of salaries.
-
Over-centralization and inefficient provincial control.
-
Rise of regional powers and disintegration of loyalty.
-
Aurangzeb’s overextension of the empire and religious intolerance.
-
Conclusion
The Mughal administrative system, especially under Akbar, was a masterpiece of imperial governance—a blend of Persian bureaucracy, Indian traditions, and military precision. The mansabdari system ensured control over a vast and diverse empire, while provincial structures balanced autonomy and authority. However, its success relied heavily on a strong central figure. As that central control weakened under later emperors, the system collapsed, giving way to regional fragmentation. Nonetheless, its legacy of structured governance and revenue administration influenced even the British colonial setup and continues to echo in modern India.